Beitrag
Teile dein Wissen.
Is it possible to define a constructor in Solidity using the contract name and function keyword?
I have seen constructors in Solidity defined with the constructor keyword within the contract, as shown below:
contract Person {
address public owner;
// Constructor
constructor() {
owner = msg.sender;
}
// Other functions and variables...
}
However, I'm curious if it's valid to define the constructor using the contract name and function keyword, like this:
contract Person {
address public owner;
// Constructor
function Person() public payable {
owner = msg.sender;
}
// Other functions and variables...
}
Would this alternative way of defining the constructor work in Solidity, or is it necessary to use the constructor keyword?
- Smart Contract
- Quests
please find the answer below
Thanks..
Antworten
3Before version 0.4.22 of Solidity, constructors were defined as functions with the same name as the contract. However, this syntax has been deprecated and is no longer allowed starting from version 0.5.0.
Thank you!
No, it is not possible to define a constructor in Solidity using the contract name and the function
keyword. Constructors in Solidity are explicitly defined using the constructor
keyword, and they do not use the naming convention of the contract, which is a requirement in some other programming languages. For example:
contract MyContract {
constructor() {
// Initialization code
}
}
In this example, the constructor is defined with the constructor
keyword, not with MyContract
followed by function
.
In Solidity, a constructor is defined using a special function that is executed upon the creation of a contract. The syntax for defining a constructor does not use the function keyword; instead, it uses the contract's name directly, which serves as the name of the constructor.
Weißt du die Antwort?
Bitte melde dich an und teile sie.
Sui is an innovative, decentralized Layer 1 blockchain that redefines asset ownership.